image

Orthopedic Software Market Report Scope & Overview:

The Orthopedic Software Market Size was assessed at USD 392.74 million in 2023, and is predicted to increase at a CAGR of 8.1 percent from 2024 to 2031, to reach USD 732.35 million.

Orthopedic software allows orthopedic physicians and surgeons to improve the way they keep track of treatment processes and clinical data while saving time. This software aids surgeons during surgery and assists in the maintenance of electronic health records (EHR).

Orthopedic Software Market Revenue Analysis

Get more information on Orthopedic Software Market - Request Sample Report

The increase in the incidence of arthritis due to the growing number of the elderly, the growing pressure to improve quality of care and reduce the cost of health care, increased EHR adoption and other eHealth solutions, and the growing demand for slower therapies all drive the market. forward. However, doubts among orthopedic surgeons to use orthopedic software due to privacy and data security, lack of trained and competent resources, the need for large infrastructure investments, and the high cost of distributing software solutions are expected to reduce market growth during forecasting time.

MARKET DYNAMICS:

DRIVERS

  • The expanding senior population is leading to an increase in the incidence of orthopedic problems.

  • Increasing demand to enhance healthcare quality and cut costs

  • EHRs and other eHealth technologies are becoming more widely used.

  • The desire for minimally invasive treatments is increasing.

RESTRAINTS

  • There is a reluctance among orthopaedic surgeons to employ orthopaedic software because of privacy and data security issues.

  • There is a scarcity of qualified and skilled personnel.

  • Infrastructure investments are large, and deployment costs are considerable.

OPPORTUNITIES

  • The application of orthopaedic software in mobile platforms and the availability of orthopaedic software as cloud-based solutions

  • Shift in healthcare delivery to be more patient-centered

CHALLENGES

  • Integrity and interoperability are lacking.

  • Due to mergers between healthcare organisations, technology is being consolidated.

  • Lack of awareness causes a hesitancy to accept innovative solutions.

IMPACT OF COVID-19

The covid-19 epidemic wreaked havoc on worldwide markets, particularly the orthopedic software market. The orthopedic and musculoskeletal departments, like other healthcare departments, have accelerated their use of virtual care delivery methods, boosting the worldwide orthopedic software market's growth. The government's relaxation and improvement of some guidelines, in particular, has facilitated the rapid adoption of these technologies. In recent years, the worldwide orthopedic software industry has had excellent growth outcomes due to the rapid adoption of payment models to improve virtual patient care, particularly during pandemic periods. As a result, while the pandemic interrupted the worldwide orthopedic software business, it also provided a significant boost to the sector.

By Type of Product

Orthopedic digital templating/preoperative planning software, orthopedic electronic health records (EHRs), orthopedic practice management (PM), orthopedic picture archiving and communication systems (PACS), and orthopedic revenue cycle management are the different segments of the orthopedic software market (RCM). The segment of the worldwide orthopedic software market that deals with picture archiving and communication systems (PACS). The accessibility of muscular PACS that is associated with advanced templating programming is driving the interest for muscular PACS since it permits specialists to productively do computerized templating more. This shifts the emphasis away from time-consuming surgical procedures. It also cuts down on the additional expenditures associated with equipment sterilization.

By Mode of Delivery

On-premise and cloud-based orthopedic software options are available. The market for orthopedic software was dominated by on-premise options. This is due to on-premise systems' increased control and security of patient data.

By Application

Joint replacement, fracture management, pediatric assessment, and other applications are the four key categories of orthopedic software. The joint replacement market held the greatest share of the whole market. During the forecast period, this segment likewise had the highest CAGR. The expanded commonness of constant illnesses has brought about an expansion in the quantity of joint tasks performed and, thus, the quantity of amendment methods performed, which is impelling the market forward. Non-crisis medical procedures have been shoved aside because of the effect of COVID-19. In the next months, this is projected to lower demand for orthopedic surgical instruments.

By End Users

Hospitals, ambulatory care centres, and other end users are divided into the orthopaedic software market. The market for orthopaedic software is dominated by the healthcare sector. The advent of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the necessity for patient data for PHM, has fueled strong demand for orthopaedic software among hospitals.

KEY MARKET SEGMENTATION:

By Type of Product

  • Orthopedic Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS)

  • Digital templating/Pre-operative Planning software

  • Orthopedic Electronic health records

  • Orthopedic Revenue Cycle Management (RCM)

  • Orthopedic Practice management

By Mode of Delivery

  • On-premises software

  • Cloud-based software

By Application

  • Joint Replacement

  • Pediatric Assessment

  • Fracture Management

By End Users

  • Hospitals

  • Ambulatory Care centers

REGIONAL ANALYSIS

North America, Latin America, Europe, Asia Pacific, and the Middle East and Africa are the five key regions that make up the orthopedic software market. During the predicted period, North America held the greatest market share. The muscular programming market in North America is creating because of variables, for example, expanded reception of electronic wellbeing records (EHRs), government endeavors to further develop the medical services framework, and a rising number of flow research projects.

During the projected period, however, the Asia Pacific region is expected to increase the most. The orthopedic market in this region will expand as a result of lower penetration of orthopedic software, the need to strengthen healthcare infrastructures, and the growing demand to reduce healthcare expenses.

Orthopedic Software Market By Region

Need any customization research on Orthopedic Software Market - Enquiry Now

REGIONAL COVERAGE:

  • North America

    • USA

    • Canada

    • Mexico

  • Europe

    • Germany

    • UK

    • France

    • Italy

    • Spain

    • The Netherlands

    • Rest of Europe

  • Asia-Pacific

    • Japan

    • south Korea

    • China

    • India

    • Australia

    • Rest of Asia-Pacific

  • The Middle East & Africa

    • Israel

    • UAE

    • South Africa

    • Rest of Middle East & Africa

  • Latin America

    • Brazil

    • Argentina

    • Rest of Latin America

KEY PLAYERS:

Some of the major key players are as follows: Medstrat, Inc., Brainlab AG, Materialise NV, Greenway Health, CureMD Healthcare, Merge Healthcare Incorporated, NextGen Healthcare LLC, Philips Healthcare, GE Healthcare, and McKesson Corporation and Other Players.

Materialise NV-Company Financial Analysis

Company Landscape Analysis

Orthopedic Software Market Report Scope:
Report Attributes Details
Market Size in 2023  US$ 392.74 Million
Market Size by 2031  US$ 732.35 Million
CAGR  CAGR of 8.1% From 2024 to 2031
Base Year   2023
Forecast Period  2024-2031
Historical Data  2020-2022
Report Scope & Coverage Market Size, Segments Analysis, Competitive  Landscape, Regional Analysis, DROC & SWOT Analysis, Forecast Outlook
Key Segments • By Type of Product (Orthopedic Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS), Digital templating/Pre-operative Planning software, Orthopedic Electronic health records, Orthopedic revenue cycle management (RCM), Orthopedic Practice management)
• By Mode of Delivery (On-premises software, Cloud-based software)
• By Application (Joint Replacement, Pediatric Assessment, Fracture Management)
• By End Users (Hospitals, Ambulatory Care centers)
Regional Analysis/Coverage North America (USA, Canada, Mexico), Europe
(Germany, UK, France, Italy, Spain, Netherlands,
Rest of Europe), Asia-Pacific (Japan, South Korea,
China, India, Australia, Rest of Asia-Pacific), The
Middle East & Africa (Israel, UAE, South Africa,
Rest of Middle East & Africa), Latin America (Brazil, Argentina, Rest of Latin America)
Company Profiles Medstrat, Inc., Brainlab AG, Materialise NV, Greenway Health, CureMD Healthcare, Merge Healthcare Incorporated, NextGen Healthcare LLC, Philips Healthcare, GE Healthcare, and McKesson Corporation.
DRIVERS • The expanding senior population is leading to an increase in the incidence of orthopedic problems.
• Increasing demand to enhance healthcare quality and cut costs
• EHRs and other eHealth technologies are becoming more widely used.
RESTRAINTS • There is a reluctance among orthopaedic surgeons to employ orthopaedic software because of privacy and data security issues.
• There is a scarcity of qualified and skilled personnel.
• Infrastructure investments are large, and deployment costs are considerable.

Frequently Asked Questions

Ans: The Orthopedic Software Market size was valued at US$ 392.74 Mn in 2023.

Ans: The Orthopedic Software Market is to grow at a CAGR of 8.1% over the forecast period 2024-2031.

North America held the greatest market share.

Increasing demand to enhance healthcare quality and cut costs, EHRs and other eHealth technologies are becoming more widely used. are drivers of Orthopedic Software market.

There is a scarcity of qualified and skilled personnel, Infrastructure investments are large, and deployment costs are considerable is the main restraints of the Orthopedic Software market.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

1.1 Market Definition

1.2 Scope

1.3 Research Assumptions

2. Research Methodology

3. Market Dynamics

3.1 Drivers

3.2 Restraints

3.3 Opportunities

3.4 Challenges

4. Impact Analysis

4.1 COVID-19 Impact Analysis

4.2 Impact of Ukraine- Russia War

4.3 Impact of Ongoing Recession

4.3.1 Introduction

4.3.2 Impact on major economies

4.3.2.1 US

4.3.2.2 Canada

4.3.2.3 Germany

4.3.2.4 France

4.3.2.5 United Kingdom

4.3.2.6 China

4.3.2.7 Japan

4.3.2.8 South Korea

4.3.2.9 Rest of the World

5. Value Chain Analysis

6. Porter’s 5 forces model

7.  PEST Analysis

  

8. Orthopedic Software Market Segmentation, By Type of Product

8.1 Orthopedic Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS)

8.2 Digital templating/Pre-operative Planning software

8.3 Orthopedic Electronic health records

8.4 Orthopedic Revenue Cycle Management (RCM)

8.5 Orthopedic Practice Management

9. Orthopedic Software Market Segmentation, By Mode of Delivery

9.1 On-premises software

9.2 Cloud-based software

10. Orthopedic Software Market Segmentation, By Application

10.1 Joint Replacement

10.2 Pediatric Assessment

10.3 Fracture Management

11. Orthopedic Software Market Segmentation, By End Users

11.1 Hospitals

11.2 Ambulatory Care Centers

12. Regional Analysis

12.1 Introduction

12.2 North America

12.2.1 USA

12.2.2 Canada

12.2.3 Mexico

12.3 Europe

12.3.1 Germany

12.3.2 UK

12.3.3 France

12.3.4 Italy

12.3.5 Spain

12.3.6 The Netherlands

12.3.7 Rest of Europe

12.4 Asia-Pacific

12.4.1 Japan

12.4.2 South Korea

12.4.3 China

12.4.4 India

12.4.5 Australia

12.4.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific

12.5 The Middle East & Africa

12.5.1 Israel

12.5.2 UAE

12.5.3 South Africa

12.5.4 Rest

12.6 Latin America

12.6.1 Brazil

12.6.2 Argentina

12.6.3 Rest of Latin America

13. Company Profiles

13.1 Medstrat, Inc.

13.1.1 Financial

13.1.2 Products/ Services Offered

13.1.3 SWOT Analysis

13.1.4 The SNS view

13.2 Brainlab AG

13.3 Materialise NV

13.4 Greenway Health

13.5 CureMD Healthcare

13.6 Merge Healthcare Incorporated

13.7 NextGen Healthcare LLC

13.8 Philips Healthcare

13.9 GE Healthcare

13.10 McKesson Corporation.

14. Competitive Landscape

14.1 Competitive Benchmark

14.2 Market Share Analysis

14.3 Recent Developments

15. Conclusion

An accurate research report requires proper strategizing as well as implementation. There are multiple factors involved in the completion of good and accurate research report and selecting the best methodology to compete the research is the toughest part. Since the research reports we provide play a crucial role in any company’s decision-making process, therefore we at SNS Insider always believe that we should choose the best method which gives us results closer to reality. This allows us to reach at a stage wherein we can provide our clients best and accurate investment to output ratio.

Each report that we prepare takes a timeframe of 350-400 business hours for production. Starting from the selection of titles through a couple of in-depth brain storming session to the final QC process before uploading our titles on our website we dedicate around 350 working hours. The titles are selected based on their current market cap and the foreseen CAGR and growth.

 

The 5 steps process:

Step 1: Secondary Research:

Secondary Research or Desk Research is as the name suggests is a research process wherein, we collect data through the readily available information. In this process we use various paid and unpaid databases which our team has access to and gather data through the same. This includes examining of listed companies’ annual reports, Journals, SEC filling etc. Apart from this our team has access to various associations across the globe across different industries. Lastly, we have exchange relationships with various university as well as individual libraries.

Secondary Research

Step 2: Primary Research

When we talk about primary research, it is a type of study in which the researchers collect relevant data samples directly, rather than relying on previously collected data.  This type of research is focused on gaining content specific facts that can be sued to solve specific problems. Since the collected data is fresh and first hand therefore it makes the study more accurate and genuine.

We at SNS Insider have divided Primary Research into 2 parts.

Part 1 wherein we interview the KOLs of major players as well as the upcoming ones across various geographic regions. This allows us to have their view over the market scenario and acts as an important tool to come closer to the accurate market numbers. As many as 45 paid and unpaid primary interviews are taken from both the demand and supply side of the industry to make sure we land at an accurate judgement and analysis of the market.

This step involves the triangulation of data wherein our team analyses the interview transcripts, online survey responses and observation of on filed participants. The below mentioned chart should give a better understanding of the part 1 of the primary interview.

Primary Research

Part 2: In this part of primary research the data collected via secondary research and the part 1 of the primary research is validated with the interviews from individual consultants and subject matter experts.

Consultants are those set of people who have at least 12 years of experience and expertise within the industry whereas Subject Matter Experts are those with at least 15 years of experience behind their back within the same space. The data with the help of two main processes i.e., FGDs (Focused Group Discussions) and IDs (Individual Discussions). This gives us a 3rd party nonbiased primary view of the market scenario making it a more dependable one while collation of the data pointers.

Step 3: Data Bank Validation

Once all the information is collected via primary and secondary sources, we run that information for data validation. At our intelligence centre our research heads track a lot of information related to the market which includes the quarterly reports, the daily stock prices, and other relevant information. Our data bank server gets updated every fortnight and that is how the information which we collected using our primary and secondary information is revalidated in real time.

Data Bank Validation

Step 4: QA/QC Process

After all the data collection and validation our team does a final level of quality check and quality assurance to get rid of any unwanted or undesired mistakes. This might include but not limited to getting rid of the any typos, duplication of numbers or missing of any important information. The people involved in this process include technical content writers, research heads and graphics people. Once this process is completed the title gets uploader on our platform for our clients to read it.

Step 5: Final QC/QA Process:

This is the last process and comes when the client has ordered the study. In this process a final QA/QC is done before the study is emailed to the client. Since we believe in giving our clients a good experience of our research studies, therefore, to make sure that we do not lack at our end in any way humanly possible we do a final round of quality check and then dispatch the study to the client.

Start a Conversation

Hi! Click one of our member below to chat on Phone