image

Tool Holder Market Report Scope & Overview:

The Tool Holder Market Size was esteemed at USD 1.23 billion in 2023 and is supposed to arrive at USD 1.87 billion by 2031 and develop at a CAGR of 5.34% over the forecast period 2024-2031.

The flourishing automotive and aerospace industries, particularly in developing nations like China and India, are significant consumers of tool holders. With a projected 20% rise in urban populations by 2050, the demand for vehicles and aircraft is expected to climb, consequently promoting the need for tool holders in these sectors. Secondly, advancements in manufacturing technology are playing a key role.

Tool Holder Market Revenue Analysis

To get more information on Tool Holder Market - Request Free Sample Report

The adoption of Internet of Things (IoT) for tool holder health monitoring and the development of innovative tool holder designs are enhancing efficiency and productivity in machine shops. Finally, government initiatives in several countries are providing a further boost. For instance, the US is witnessing increased defense spending, which translates to a rise in private sector defense equipment manufacturing, a domain heavily reliant on tool holders. This mixture of industrial growth, technological innovation, and government support is creating a strong environment for the tool holder market. 

Market Dynamics

Driving Factors

  • With an expansion in urbanization and industrialization in arising nations.

  • The apparatus holder is utilized in different industry verticals, for example, car, aviation, and protection, attributable to the ascent sought after for device holders.

From car manufacturing requiring high-precision tool holders for engine assembly to aviation relying on them for delicate aircraft component machining, the demand spans diverse sectors. Even the security industry utilizes tool holders for tasks like security door installation. This widespread adoption, coupled with government initiatives promoting automation and advanced manufacturing in certain regions, paints a promising picture for the tool holder market's future.

Restrain:

  • Change in unfamiliar monetary forms and unpredictable financial circumstances in the creating economies.

Opportunities

  • An expansion in interests in this area by the public authority.

  • Profoundly productive, unbending, and high upset each moment (rpm) highlights.

A growing emphasis on vocational training programs by governments is driving increased interest in the tool holder market. A recent study in the United States found a 25% rise in enrolment for vocational courses since 2019. This translates to a significant demand for well-equipped workshops and training facilities, fuelling the need for secure and versatile tool holders. To capitalize on this trend, some governments are introducing initiatives like tax breaks for businesses investing in advanced tool storage solutions.

Challenges:

  • A huge venture of cash and space for the machine to warm up the instrument holders.

Impact of Russia Ukraine War:

Demand for tool holders, which secure cutting tools on machines, has fluctuated significantly. While some industries, like aerospace and defense, have witnessed a push in demand up to 15% due to increased military production, core sectors like automotive have seen a decline around 10% as supply chain disruptions and inflation dampen consumer spending. This uneven demand, coupled with rising material costs of up to 20%, has squeezed margins for key players like Sandvik (Sweden), Kennametal (US), and Mitsubishi Materials (Japan). They're navigating this complex situation by implementing cost-saving measures and exploring alternative materials, but the full impact on the market's long-term stability remains to be seen.

Impact of Economic Slowdown:

During a 20% decline in manufacturing output, demand for tool holders can decrease by 15%, according to SNS Insider analysis. This dip is due to factories delaying non-essential purchases and prioritizing maintenance of existing equipment. Additionally, rising material costs due to inflation can push production expenses up by 10%, negatively impacting profit margins and further discouraging new tool holder acquisitions. This can be particularly challenging for smaller players.

However, established manufacturers like Kennametal and Sandvik Coromant, with their diversified product lines and established customer bases, may be better positioned to weather the storm. They can leverage their economies of scale to absorb some of the cost increases and potentially even gain market share by offering competitive pricing. Overall, an economic slowdown presents headwinds for the tool holder market, but its severity can vary depending on the company's size and product portfolio.

MARKET SEGMENTATION ANALYSIS:

By Taper Type:

R8 tapers dominate the portable drill and milling machine market estimated at 35%. Morse tapers, offering better holding power, hold a strong 20% share in lathes and drill presses. V-flange tapers, prized for high accuracy and rigidity, are favored in CNC machining centers around 25%. Finally, BT flange tapers, known for their excellent speed and torque transmission, account for the remaining 20%, typically in high-performance Machine Types.

By End Use:

The tool holder market provides to diverse industries, each with distinct needs. Automotive, consuming roughly 30%, demands high-speed and durable options for mass production. Aerospace & Defense, at around 20%, prioritizes precision and stability for critical parts. The electronics segment, at 15%, requires delicate tool holders for intricate components. Finally, general machining and fabrication, including the remaining 35%, utilizes a wide range of tool holders for various application.

Key Market Segmentation

By Taper Type:

  • R8

  • Morse Taper

  • V-Flange Taper

  • BT Flange Taper

Tool-Holder-Market-By-Taper-Type

Need any customization research on Tool Holder Market - Enquiry Now

 

By Tool Holders Type:

  • Collet Chuck

  • End Mill Holders

  • Hydraulic Tool holders

By Machine Type:

  • CNC Machining Centre

  • CNC Turning Centre

By End Use:

  • Automotive

  • Aerospace & Defense

  • Electronic

  • General Machining & Fabrication

Regional Analysis:

The landscape of the tool holder market is shaped by distinct regional trends. North America, with a dominant 45.8% share in 2023, stands out due to its advanced manufacturing infrastructure and widespread adoption of modern machinery. Government initiatives in the US, like the Advanced Manufacturing Partnership, further fuel this growth by promoting innovation and technological development in the sector.

According to SNS Insider analysis the Asia-Pacific region is expected to witness the fastest growth rate due to factors like rising industrialization, particularly in China and India. Here, government support comes in the form of infrastructure development plans and initiatives promoting foreign direct investment, creating a fertile ground for the tool holder market to flourish. This regional contrast highlights the interplay between established industrial bases and expanding economies in driving the tool holder market forward.

Tool-Holder-Market-By-Regional-Share

REGIONAL COVERAGE:

North America

  • US

  • Canada

  • Mexico

Europe

  • Eastern Europe

    • Poland

    • Romania

    • Hungary

    • Turkey

    • Rest of Eastern Europe

  • Western Europe

    • Germany

    • France

    • UK

    • Italy

    • Spain

    • Netherlands

    • Switzerland

    • Austria

    • Rest of Western Europe

Asia Pacific

  • China

  • India

  • Japan

  • South Korea

  • Vietnam

  • Singapore

  • Australia

  • Rest of Asia Pacific

Middle East & Africa

  • Middle East

    • UAE

    • Egypt

    • Saudi Arabia

    • Qatar

    • Rest of the Middle East

  • Africa

    • Nigeria

    • South Africa

    • Rest of Africa

Latin America

  • Brazil

  • Argentina

  • Colombia

Rest of Latin America

Key Players

The Major Players are GUHDO, Bilz Tool, LMT Onsrud, TAC Rockford, Gem Precision Tool, Kennametal, Sandvik Coromant, KTA Spindle Toolings, CERATIZIT, SECO and Other Players

Recent Developments:

  • In February 2024, Sandvik AB unveiled its Intelligent Tool Holder System, which utilizes internet-of-things (IoT) technology to monitor tool health and optimize machining processes. This allows for preventative maintenance and real-time adjustments, reducing downtime and maximizing productivity.

  • BIG KAISER Precision Tooling Inc. announced a partnership with a leading software company in April 2024 to develop AI-powered tool selection platforms. This integration will streamline tool selection for operators, minimizing human error and ensuring optimal tool choices for each job.

TAC Rockford-Company Financial Analysis

Company Landscape Analysis

Tool Holder Market Report Scope:

Report Attributes Details
Market Size in 2023 US$ 1.23 Billion
Market Size by 2031 US$ 1.87 Billion
CAGR CAGR of 5.34% From 2024 to 2031
Base Year 2023
Forecast Period 2024-2031
Historical Data 2020-2022
Report Scope & Coverage Market Size, Segments Analysis, Competitive  Landscape, Regional Analysis, DROC & SWOT Analysis, Forecast Outlook
Key Segments
  • By Taper Type (R8, Morse Taper, V-Flange Taper, BT Flange Taper)
  • By Tool Holders Type:(Collet Chuck, End Mill Holders, Hydraulic Tool holders)
  • By Machine Type:(CNC Machining Centre, CNC Turning Centre)
  • By End Use:(Automotive, Aerospace & Defense, Electronic, General Machining & Fabrication)
Regional Analysis/Coverage North America (US, Canada, Mexico), Europe (Eastern Europe [Poland, Romania, Hungary, Turkey, Rest of Eastern Europe] Western Europe] Germany, France, UK, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Switzerland, Austria, Rest of Western Europe]), Asia Pacific (China, India, Japan, South Korea, Vietnam, Singapore, Australia, Rest of Asia Pacific), Middle East & Africa (Middle East [UAE, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Rest of Middle East], Africa [Nigeria, South Africa, Rest of Africa], Latin America (Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, Rest of Latin America)
Company Profiles GUHDO, Bilz Tool, LMT Onsrud, TAC Rockford, Gem Precision Tool, Kennametal, Sandvik Coromant, KTA Spindle Toolings, CERATIZIT, SECO
Key Drivers • With an expansion in urbanization and industrialization in arising nations.
RESTRAINTS • Change in unfamiliar monetary forms and unpredictable financial circumstances in the creating economies.

Frequently Asked Questions

Ans: A huge venture of cash and space for the machine to warm up the instrument holders.

Ans:  The Tool Holder Market size was valued at USD 1.23 billion in 2023.

 Ans: The Tool Holder Market size is estimated to reach USD 1.87 billion by 2031.

Ans: North America has the biggest offer in the Tool Holder market.

Ans: The Tool Holder Market is growing at a CAGR of 5.34% from 2024 to 2031.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Introduction

1.1 Market Definition

1.2 Scope

1.3 Research Assumptions

2. Industry Flowchart

3. Research Methodology

4. Market Dynamics

4.1 Drivers

4.2 Restraints

4.3 Opportunities

4.4 Challenges

5. Impact Analysis

5.1 Impact of Russia-Ukraine Crisis

5.2 Impact of Economic Slowdown on Major Countries

5.2.1 Introduction

5.2.2 United States

5.2.3 Canada

5.2.4 Germany

5.2.5 France

5.2.6 UK

5.2.7 China

5.2.8 Japan

5.2.9 South Korea

5.2.10 India

6. Value Chain Analysis

7. Porter’s 5 Forces Model

8. Pest Analysis

9. Tool Holder Segmentation, By Taper Type

9.1 Introduction

9.2 Trend Analysis

9.3 R8

9.4 Morse Taper

9.5 V-Flange Taper

9.6 BT Flange Taper

10. Tool Holder Segmentation, By Tool Holders Type

10.1 Introduction

10.2 Trend Analysis

10.3 Collet Chuck

10.4 End Mill Holders

10.5 Hydraulic Tool holders

11. Tool Holder Segmentation, By Machine Type

11.1 Introduction

11.2 Trend Analysis

11.3 CNC Machining Centre

11.4 CNC Turning Centre

12. Tool Holder Segmentation, By End Users

12.1 Introduction

12.2 Trend Analysis

12.3 Automotive

12.4 Aerospace & Defense

12.5 Electronic

12.6 General Machining & Fabrication

13. Regional Analysis

13.1 Introduction

13.2 North America

13.2.1 Trend Analysis

13.2.2 North America Tool Holder by Country

13.2.3 North America Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.2.4 North America Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.2.5 North America Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.2.6 North America Tool Holder By End Users

13.2.7 USA

13.2.7.1 USA Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.2.7.2 USA Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.2.7.3 USA Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.2.7.4 USA Tool Holder By End Users

13.2.8 Canada

13.2.8.1 Canada Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.2.8.2 Canada Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.2.8.3 Canada Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.2.8.4 Canada Tool Holder By End Users

13.2.9 Mexico

13.2.9.1 Mexico Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.2.9.2 Mexico Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.2.9.3 Mexico Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.2.9.4 Mexico Tool Holder By End Users

13.3 Europe

13.3.1 Trend Analysis

13.3.2 Eastern Europe

13.3.2.1 Eastern Europe Tool Holder by Country

13.3.2.2 Eastern Europe Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.3.2.3 Eastern Europe Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.3.2.4 Eastern Europe Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.3.2.5 Eastern Europe Tool Holder By End Users

13.3.2.6 Poland

13.3.2.6.1 Poland Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.3.2.6.2 Poland Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.3.2.6.3 Poland Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.3.2.6.4 Poland Tool Holder By End Users

13.3.2.7 Romania

13.3.2.7.1 Romania Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.3.2.7.2 Romania Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.3.2.7.3 Romania Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.3.2.7.4 Romania Tool Holder By End Users

13.3.2.8 Hungary

13.3.2.8.1 Hungary Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.3.2.8.2 Hungary Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.3.2.8.3 Hungary Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.3.2.8.4 Hungary Tool Holder By End Users

13.3.2.9 Turkey

13.3.2.9.1 Turkey Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.3.2.9.2 Turkey Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.3.2.9.3 Turkey Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.3.2.9.4 Turkey Tool Holder By End Users

13.3.2.10 Rest of Eastern Europe

13.3.2.10.1 Rest of Eastern Europe Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.3.2.10.2 Rest of Eastern Europe Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.3.2.10.3 Rest of Eastern Europe Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.3.2.10.4 Rest of Eastern Europe Tool Holder By End Users

13.3.3 Western Europe

13.3.3.1 Western Europe Tool Holder by Country

13.3.3.2 Western Europe Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.3.3.3 Western Europe Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.3.3.4 Western Europe Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.3.3.5 Western Europe Tool Holder By End Users

13.3.3.6 Germany

13.3.3.6.1 Germany Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.3.3.6.2 Germany Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.3.3.6.3 Germany Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.3.3.6.4 Germany Tool Holder By End Users

13.3.3.7 France

13.3.3.7.1 France Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.3.3.7.2 France Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.3.3.7.3 France Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.3.3.7.4 France Tool Holder By End Users

13.3.3.8 UK

13.3.3.8.1 UK Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.3.3.8.2 UK Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.3.3.8.3 UK Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.3.3.8.4 UK Tool Holder By End Users

13.3.3.9 Italy

13.3.3.9.1 Italy Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.3.3.9.2 Italy Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.3.3.9.3 Italy Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.3.3.9.4 Italy Tool Holder By End Users

13.3.3.10 Spain

13.3.3.10.1 Spain Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.3.3.10.2 Spain Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.3.3.10.3 Spain Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.3.3.10.4 Spain Tool Holder By End Users

13.3.3.11 Netherlands

13.3.3.11.1 Netherlands Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.3.3.11.2 Netherlands Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.3.3.11.3 Netherlands Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.3.3.11.4 Netherlands Tool Holder By End Users

13.3.3.12 Switzerland

13.3.3.12.1 Switzerland Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.3.3.12.2 Switzerland Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.3.3.12.3 Switzerland Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.3.3.12.4 Switzerland Tool Holder By End Users

13.3.3.13 Austria

13.3.3.13.1 Austria Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.3.3.13.2 Austria Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.3.3.13.3 Austria Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.3.3.13.4 Austria Tool Holder By End Users

13.3.3.14 Rest of Western Europe

13.3.3.14.1 Rest of Western Europe Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.3.3.14.2 Rest of Western Europe Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.3.3.14.3 Rest of Western Europe Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.3.3.14.4 Rest of Western Europe Tool Holder By End Users

13.4 Asia-Pacific

13.4.1 Trend Analysis

13.4.2 Asia-Pacific Tool Holder by Country

13.4.3 Asia-Pacific Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.4.4 Asia-Pacific Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.4.5 Asia-Pacific Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.4.6 Asia-Pacific Tool Holder By End Users

13.4.7 China

13.4.7.1 China Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.4.7.2 China Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.4.7.3 China Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.4.7.4 China Tool Holder By End Users

13.4.8 India

13.4.8.1 India Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.4.8.2 India Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.4.8.3 India Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.4.8.4 India Tool Holder By End Users

13.4.9 Japan

13.4.9.1 Japan Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.4.9.2 Japan Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.4.9.3 Japan Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.4.9.4 Japan Tool Holder By End Users

13.4.10 South Korea

13.4.10.1 South Korea Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.4.10.2 South Korea Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.4.10.3 South Korea Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.4.10.4 South Korea Tool Holder By End Users

13.4.11 Vietnam

13.4.11.1 Vietnam Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.4.11.2 Vietnam Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.4.11.3 Vietnam Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.4.11.4 Vietnam Tool Holder By End Users

13.4.12 Singapore

13.4.12.1 Singapore Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.4.12.2 Singapore Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.4.12.3 Singapore Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.4.12.4 Singapore Tool Holder By End Users

13.4.13 Australia

13.4.13.1 Australia Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.4.13.2 Australia Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.4.13.3 Australia Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.4.13.4 Australia Tool Holder By End Users

13.4.14 Rest of Asia-Pacific

13.4.14.1 Rest of Asia-Pacific Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.4.14.2 Rest of Asia-Pacific Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.4.14.3 Rest of Asia-Pacific Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.4.14.4 Rest of Asia-Pacific Tool Holder By End Users

13.5 Middle East & Africa

13.5.1 Trend Analysis

13.5.2 Middle East

13.5.2.1 Middle East Tool Holder by Country

13.5.2.2 Middle East Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.5.2.3 Middle East Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.5.2.4 Middle East Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.5.2.5 Middle East Tool Holder By End Users

13.5.2.6 UAE

13.5.2.6.1 UAE Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.5.2.6.2 UAE Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.5.2.6.3 UAE Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.5.2.6.4 UAE Tool Holder By End Users

13.5.2.7 Egypt

13.5.2.7.1 Egypt Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.5.2.7.2 Egypt Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.5.2.7.3 Egypt Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.5.2.7.4 Egypt Tool Holder By End Users

13.5.2.8 Saudi Arabia

13.5.2.8.1 Saudi Arabia Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.5.2.8.2 Saudi Arabia Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.5.2.8.3 Saudi Arabia Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.5.2.8.4 Saudi Arabia Tool Holder By End Users

13.5.2.9 Qatar

13.5.2.9.1 Qatar Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.5.2.9.2 Qatar Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.5.2.9.3 Qatar Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.5.2.9.4 Qatar Tool Holder By End Users

13.5.2.10 Rest of Middle East

13.5.2.10.1 Rest of Middle East Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.5.2.10.2 Rest of Middle East Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.5.2.10.3 Rest of Middle East Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.5.2.10.4 Rest of Middle East Tool Holder By End Users

13.5.3 Africa

13.5.3.1 Africa Tool Holder by Country

13.5.3.2 Africa Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.5.3.3 Africa Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.5.3.4 Africa Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.5.3.5 Africa Tool Holder By End Users

13.5.3.6 Nigeria

13.5.3.6.1 Nigeria Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.5.3.6.2 Nigeria Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.5.3.6.3 Nigeria Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.5.3.6.4 Nigeria Tool Holder By End Users

13.5.3.7 South Africa

13.5.3.7.1 South Africa Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.5.3.7.2 South Africa Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.5.3.7.3 South Africa Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.5.3.7.4 South Africa Tool Holder By End Users

13.5.3.8 Rest of Africa

13.5.3.8.1 Rest of Africa Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.5.3.8.2 Rest of Africa Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.5.3.8.3 Rest of Africa Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.5.3.8.4 Rest of Africa Tool Holder By End Users

13.6 Latin America

13.6.1 Trend Analysis

13.6.2 Latin America Tool Holder by country

13.6.3 Latin America Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.6.4 Latin America Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.6.5 Latin America Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.6.6 Latin America Tool Holder By End Users

13.6.7 Brazil

13.6.7.1 Brazil Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.6.7.2 Brazil Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.6.7.3 Brazil Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.6.7.4 Brazil Tool Holder By End Users

13.6.8 Argentina

13.6.8.1 Argentina Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.6.8.2 Argentina Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.6.8.3 Argentina Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.6.8.4 Argentina Tool Holder By End Users

13.6.9 Colombia

13.6.9.1 Colombia Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.6.9.2 Colombia Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.6.9.3 Colombia Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.6.9.4 Colombia Tool Holder By End Users

13.6.10 Rest of Latin America

13.6.10.1 Rest of Latin America Tool Holder By Taper Type

13.6.10.2 Rest of Latin America Tool Holder By Tool Holders Type

13.6.10.3 Rest of Latin America Tool Holder By Machine Type

13.6.10.4 Rest of Latin America Tool Holder By End Users

14. Company Profiles

14.1 GUHDO

14.1.1 Company Overview

14.1.2 Financial

14.1.3 Products/ Services Offered

14.1.4 SWOT Analysis

14.1.5 The SNS View

14.2 Bilz Tool

14.2.1 Company Overview

14.2.2 Financial

14.2.3 Products/ Services Offered

14.2.4 SWOT Analysis

14.2.5 The SNS View

14.3 LMT Onsrud

14.3.1 Company Overview

14.3.2 Financial

14.3.3 Products/ Services Offered

14.3.4 SWOT Analysis

14.3.5 The SNS View

14.4 TAC Rockford

14.4.1 Company Overview

14.4.2 Financial

14.4.3 Products/ Services Offered

14.4.4 SWOT Analysis

14.4.5 The SNS View

14.5 Gem Precision Tool

14.5.1 Company Overview

14.5.2 Financial

14.5.3 Products/ Services Offered

14.5.4 SWOT Analysis

14.5.5 The SNS View

14.6 Kennametal

14.6.1 Company Overview

14.6.2 Financial

14.6.3 Products/ Services Offered

14.6.4 SWOT Analysis

14.6.5 The SNS View

14.7 Sandvik Coromant

14.7.1 Company Overview

14.7.2 Financial

14.7.3 Products/ Services Offered

14.7.4 SWOT Analysis

14.7.5 The SNS View

14.8 KTA Spindle Toolings

14.8.1 Company Overview

14.8.2 Financial

14.8.3 Products/ Services Offered

14.8.4 SWOT Analysis

14.8.5 The SNS View

14.9 CERATIZIT

14.9.1 Company Overview

14.9.2 Financial

14.9.3 Products/ Services Offered

14.9.4 SWOT Analysis

14.9.5 The SNS View

14.10 SECO

14.10.1 Company Overview

14.10.2 Financial

14.10.3 Products/ Services Offered

14.10.4 SWOT Analysis

14.10.5 The SNS View

15. Competitive Landscape

15.1 Competitive Benchmarking

15.2 Market Share Analysis

15.3 Recent Developments

15.3.1 Industry News

15.3.2 Company News

15.3.3 Mergers & Acquisitions

16. Use Case and Best Practices

17. Conclusion

An accurate research report requires proper strategizing as well as implementation. There are multiple factors involved in the completion of good and accurate research report and selecting the best methodology to compete the research is the toughest part. Since the research reports we provide play a crucial role in any company’s decision-making process, therefore we at SNS Insider always believe that we should choose the best method which gives us results closer to reality. This allows us to reach at a stage wherein we can provide our clients best and accurate investment to output ratio.

Each report that we prepare takes a timeframe of 350-400 business hours for production. Starting from the selection of titles through a couple of in-depth brain storming session to the final QC process before uploading our titles on our website we dedicate around 350 working hours. The titles are selected based on their current market cap and the foreseen CAGR and growth.

 

The 5 steps process:

Step 1: Secondary Research:

Secondary Research or Desk Research is as the name suggests is a research process wherein, we collect data through the readily available information. In this process we use various paid and unpaid databases which our team has access to and gather data through the same. This includes examining of listed companies’ annual reports, Journals, SEC filling etc. Apart from this our team has access to various associations across the globe across different industries. Lastly, we have exchange relationships with various university as well as individual libraries.

Secondary Research

Step 2: Primary Research

When we talk about primary research, it is a type of study in which the researchers collect relevant data samples directly, rather than relying on previously collected data.  This type of research is focused on gaining content specific facts that can be sued to solve specific problems. Since the collected data is fresh and first hand therefore it makes the study more accurate and genuine.

We at SNS Insider have divided Primary Research into 2 parts.

Part 1 wherein we interview the KOLs of major players as well as the upcoming ones across various geographic regions. This allows us to have their view over the market scenario and acts as an important tool to come closer to the accurate market numbers. As many as 45 paid and unpaid primary interviews are taken from both the demand and supply side of the industry to make sure we land at an accurate judgement and analysis of the market.

This step involves the triangulation of data wherein our team analyses the interview transcripts, online survey responses and observation of on filed participants. The below mentioned chart should give a better understanding of the part 1 of the primary interview.

Primary Research

Part 2: In this part of primary research the data collected via secondary research and the part 1 of the primary research is validated with the interviews from individual consultants and subject matter experts.

Consultants are those set of people who have at least 12 years of experience and expertise within the industry whereas Subject Matter Experts are those with at least 15 years of experience behind their back within the same space. The data with the help of two main processes i.e., FGDs (Focused Group Discussions) and IDs (Individual Discussions). This gives us a 3rd party nonbiased primary view of the market scenario making it a more dependable one while collation of the data pointers.

Step 3: Data Bank Validation

Once all the information is collected via primary and secondary sources, we run that information for data validation. At our intelligence centre our research heads track a lot of information related to the market which includes the quarterly reports, the daily stock prices, and other relevant information. Our data bank server gets updated every fortnight and that is how the information which we collected using our primary and secondary information is revalidated in real time.

Data Bank Validation

Step 4: QA/QC Process

After all the data collection and validation our team does a final level of quality check and quality assurance to get rid of any unwanted or undesired mistakes. This might include but not limited to getting rid of the any typos, duplication of numbers or missing of any important information. The people involved in this process include technical content writers, research heads and graphics people. Once this process is completed the title gets uploader on our platform for our clients to read it.

Step 5: Final QC/QA Process:

This is the last process and comes when the client has ordered the study. In this process a final QA/QC is done before the study is emailed to the client. Since we believe in giving our clients a good experience of our research studies, therefore, to make sure that we do not lack at our end in any way humanly possible we do a final round of quality check and then dispatch the study to the client.


  •            5000 (33% Discount)


  •            8950 (40% Discount)


  •            3050 (23% Discount)

Start a Conversation

Hi! Click one of our member below to chat on Phone