image

Web Content Filtering Market Report Scope & Overview:

The Web Content Filtering Market size was escalated to USD 4.98 billion in 2022 and is anticipated to reach USD 13.95 billion in 2030 with an emerging CAGR of 13.75% Over the Forecast Period of 2023-2030.

The global web content filtering market is being driven by government prohibitions on internet filtering and rising concerns about bandwidth management. Increased harmful online behavior worldwide, government actions, and support for the usage of cloud-based services are all contributing to the expansion of web filtering market sales. Favorable government rules and regulations, as well as an increasing requirement for enterprises to effectively control network bandwidth use, have all contributed to the profit growth of the web filtering sector. The surge in corporate concerns about IT security, as well as the need to control internet misuse, has created an attractive potential for the growth of the Web Filtering Market. As a result of the growing demand for greater control over employees in the workplace and the increasing pressure to comply with strict regulations, businesses of all sizes have embraced web filtering solutions to protect their sensitive data. Additionally, the cloud deployment strategy is gaining popularity in the market due to its lower capital investment requirements, reduced operating and maintenance costs, and decreased management effort.

Web Content Filtering Market Revenue Analysis

To Get More Information on Web Content Filtering Market - Request Sample Report

Market Dynamics

Drivers

  • The rising number of cyber-attacks and the widespread presence of virus issues on the internet are expected to drive the demand for web content filtering services in the foreseeable future.

  • Increased harmful online behavior worldwide.

Instances like malware attacks and spam sent through emails, targeting individuals or corporate groups, pose significant threats to the privacy policies of organizations. Consequently, the need for content filtering solutions is on the rise.

Restrains

  • There are significant expenses associated with the maintenance of online filtering software.

Opportunities

  • The ever-increasing advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) technology, particularly in the realm of superior filtering solutions.

Challenges

  • The market is hindered by a lack of product differentiation and the high price of the product.

Impact of the Russia-Ukraine

During times of geopolitical instability, there is often a surge in cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, and malicious online activities. This can lead to increased awareness among businesses and governments about the importance of web content filtering to protect their networks and users. As a result, the demand for web content filtering solutions may rise. Governments involved in the conflict may impose stricter regulations on internet access and content, leading to increased censorship. Web content filtering companies could see an uptick in business as governments seek technologies to enforce censorship and monitor online activities. However, this may raise ethical concerns about providing tools for censorship and surveillance. If the conflict disrupts supply chains or affects the operations of web content filtering companies, it could lead to delays in product development, deployment, or support. This may impact customers' ability to secure their networks effectively. Geopolitical conflicts can lead to economic uncertainty, affecting businesses' budgets and priorities. Some organizations may cut back on IT spending, including web content filtering solutions, while others may prioritize security investments. Companies in the web content filtering market may shift their focus to regions or industries that are more directly affected by the conflict. For example, they may target Eastern European markets where cybersecurity concerns are heightened due to the conflict. Sanctions imposed on Russia or Ukraine could impact the ability of web content filtering companies to do business in these regions or with companies linked to them.

Impact of Recession

During a recession, businesses often cut back on their IT budgets to reduce costs. This can impact the web content filtering market as companies may delay or scale down their investments in such solutions. Organizations may become more cost-conscious during a recession and seek out cost-effective web content filtering solutions. This could create opportunities for providers offering budget-friendly options or subscription-based services. Economic uncertainty can lead to an increase in cyber threats, as cybercriminals may take advantage of vulnerabilities in a weakened economy. This can drive up the demand for web content filtering solutions with strong security features to protect against malware, phishing, and other online threats. Recessions, like the one spurred by the COVID-19 pandemic, can accelerate trends such as remote work. As more employees work from home, companies may require enhanced web content filtering to ensure secure and productive remote access to online resources. Different industries may be impacted in varying ways during a recession. For example, sectors heavily reliant on advertising revenue, like online media and publishing, may face reduced advertising spending, potentially affecting the adoption of web content filtering solutions used for ad targeting and monitoring. In response to economic challenges, governments may implement new regulations related to online content and user privacy. These changes could impact the web content filtering market by influencing the requirements and compliance standards for businesses.

Key Market Segmentation

By Techniques

  • File Type

  • Image

  • Internet Protocol (IP)

  • Keyword

  • Profiles

  • Uniform Resource Locator (URL)

By Organization Size

  • Small and Medium Enterprises

  • Large Enterprises

By End-user

  • Business Organizations

  • Government Agencies

  • Mobile Phone Applications

  • Personal Usage

  • Schools & Educational Institutions

Web Content Filtering Market Segmentation Analysis

Do You Need any Customization Research on Web Content Filtering Market - Enquire Now

Regional Analysis

North America currently holds the largest market share and is expected to maintain its dominance in the projected period. This region's market is fueled by the escalating threat of online malware and the growing adoption of Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) policies among organizations. With its advanced technological landscape, there is a significant demand for web filtering solutions, propelling the market forward.

Meanwhile, the Asia-Pacific region is anticipated to experience rapid growth during the forecast period. The market in this region is primarily driven by the increasing internet penetration and the imperative for businesses to curb internet misuse. Additionally, the acceptance of cloud-based services across the region is also contributing to the growth of the web filtering market.

REGIONAL COVERAGE:

North America

  • US

  • Canada

  • Mexico

Europe

  • Eastern Europe

    • Poland

    • Romania

    • Hungary

    • Turkey

    • Rest of Eastern Europe

  • Western Europe

    • Germany

    • France

    • UK

    • Italy

    • Spain

    • Netherlands

    • Switzerland

    • Austria

    • Rest of Western Europe

Asia Pacific

  • China

  • India

  • Japan

  • South Korea

  • Vietnam

  • Singapore

  • Australia

  • Rest of Asia Pacific

Middle East & Africa

  • Middle East

    • UAE

    • Egypt

    • Saudi Arabia

    • Qatar

    • Rest of Middle East

  • Africa

    • Nigeria

    • South Africa

    • Rest of Africa

Latin America

  • Brazil

  • Argentina

  • Colombia

  • Rest of Latin America

Key Players:

The major players in the market are McAfee Inc., Blue Coat Systems Inc., Palo Alto Networks Inc., Cisco Systems Inc., Barracuda Networks Inc., ContentKeeper Technologies, Bloxx, Ltd., Fortinet, Interoute, TitanHQ, Clearswift, Cyren, Trend Micro, Untangle, Symantec Corporation, Kaspersky Lab, and others in final Report.

McAfee Inc-Company Financial Analysis

Company Landscape Analysis

Recent Development

In July 2020, McAfee unveiled McAfee Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) Cloud, a cutting-edge cloud-based product designed to support security operations teams in their detection, incident response, and threat-hunting activities.

In June 2020, ElevenPaths, Telefónica Tech's cybersecurity unit, and Fortinet, a leading provider of integrated and automated cybersecurity solutions, announced an expansion of their collaboration. This collaboration aims to offer new managed security services specifically tailored for customers in the industrial sector. The objective is to provide advanced security measures for their operation technology (OT), information technology (IT), and Internet of Things (IoT) environments.

Web Content Filtering Market Report Scope:

Report Attributes Details
Market Size in 2022  US$ 4.98 Bn
Market Size by 2030  US$ 13.95 Bn
CAGR   CAGR of 13.75 % From 2023 to 2030
Base Year  2022
Forecast Period  2023-2030
Historical Data  2019-2021
Report Scope & Coverage Market Size, Segments Analysis, Competitive  Landscape, Regional Analysis, DROC & SWOT Analysis, Forecast Outlook
Key Segments • By Techniques (File Type, Image, Internet Protocol (IP), Keyword, Profiles, Uniform Resource Locator (URL))
• By Organization Size (Small and Medium Enterprises, Large Enterprises)
• By End-user (Business Organizations, Government Agencies, Mobile Phone Applications, Personal Usage, Schools & Educational Institutions)
Regional Analysis/Coverage North America (US, Canada, Mexico), Europe (Eastern Europe [Poland, Romania, Hungary, Turkey, Rest of Eastern Europe] Western Europe] Germany, France, UK, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Switzerland, Austria, Rest of Western Europe]), Asia Pacific (China, India, Japan, South Korea, Vietnam, Singapore, Australia, Rest of Asia Pacific), Middle East & Africa (Middle East [UAE, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Rest of Middle East], Africa [Nigeria, South Africa, Rest of Africa], Latin America (Brazil, Argentina, Colombia Rest of Latin America)
Company Profiles McAfee Inc., Blue Coat Systems Inc., Palo Alto Networks Inc., Cisco Systems Inc., Barracuda Networks Inc., ContentKeeper Technologies, Bloxx, Ltd., Fortinet, Interoute, TitanHQ, Clearswift, Cyren, Trend Micro, Untangle, Symantec Corporation, Kaspersky Lab
Key Drivers • The rising number of cyber-attacks and the widespread presence of virus issues on the internet are expected to drive the demand for web content filtering services in the foreseeable future.
• Increased harmful online behavior worldwide.
Market Restraints • There are significant expenses associated with the maintenance of online filtering software.

 

Frequently Asked Questions

Ans: The market is expected to grow to USD 13.95 billion by the forecast period of 2030.

Ans. The CAGR of the Web Content Filtering Market for the forecast period 2022-2030 is 13.75%.

Ans: Yes, you can buy reports in bulk quantity as per your requirements. Check Here for more details.

Ans:The major players in the market are McAfee Inc., Blue Coat Systems Inc., Palo Alto Networks Inc., Cisco Systems Inc., Barracuda Networks Inc., Bloxx, Ltd., Fortinet, TitanHQ, Clearswift, Cyren, Trend Micro, Untangle, Symantec Corporation, Kaspersky Lab, and others in final Report.

Ans:

  • The ever-increasing advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) technology, particularly in the realm of superior filtering solutions.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction
1.1 Market Definition
1.2 Scope
1.3 Research Assumptions

2. Research Methodology

3. Market Dynamics
3.1 Drivers
3.2 Restraints
3.3 Opportunities
3.4 Challenges

4. Impact Analysis
4.1 Impact of Russia-Ukraine War
4.2 Impact of Ongoing Recession
4.2.1 Introduction
4.2.2 Impact on major economies
4.2.2.1 US
4.2.2.2 Canada
4.2.2.3 Germany
4.2.2.4 France
4.2.2.5 United Kingdom
4.2.2.6 China
4.2.2.7 japan
4.2.2.8 South Korea
4.2.2.9 Rest of the World

5. Value Chain Analysis

6. Porter’s 5 forces model

7. PEST Analysis

8. Web Content Filtering Market, By Techniques
8.1 On-Premise
8.2 Cloud
8.3 Hybrid

9. Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
9.1 Small & Medium Enterprises
9.2 Large Enterprises

10. Web Content Filtering Market, By End-user
10.1 Business Organizations
10.2 Government Agencies
10.3 Mobile Phone Applications
10.4 Personal Usage
10.5 Schools & Educational Institutions

11. Regional Analysis
11.1 Introduction
11.2 North America
11.2.1 North America Web Content Filtering Market By Country
11.2.2North America Web Content Filtering Market By Techniques
11.2.3 North America Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
11.2.4 North America Web Content Filtering Market By End-user
11.2.5 USA
11.2.5.1 USA Web Content Filtering Market By Techniques
11.2.5.2 USA Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
11.2.5.3 USA Web Content Filtering Market By End-user
11.2.6 Canada
11.2.6.1 Canada Web Content Filtering Market By Techniques
11.2.6.2 Canada Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
11.2.6.3 Canada Web Content Filtering Market By End-user
11.2.7 Mexico
11.2.7.1 Mexico Web Content Filtering Market By Techniques
11.2.7.2 Mexico Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
11.2.7.3 Mexico Web Content Filtering Market By End-user
11.3 Europe
11.3.1 Eastern Europe
11.3.1.1 Eastern Europe Web Content Filtering Market by Country
11.3.1.2 Eastern Europe Web Content Filtering Market By Techniques
11.3.1.3 Eastern Europe Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
11.3.1.4 Eastern Europe Web Content Filtering Market By End-user
11.3.1.5 Poland
11.3.1.5.1 Poland Web Content Filtering Market By Techniques
11.3.1.5.2 Poland Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
11.3.1.5.3 Poland Web Content Filtering Market By End-user
11.3.1.6 Romania
11.3.1.6.1 Romania Web Content Filtering Market By Techniques
11.3.1.6.2 Romania Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
11.3.1.6.4 Romania Web Content Filtering Market By End-user
11.3.1.7 Turkey
11.3.1.7.1 Turkey Web Content Filtering Market By Techniques
11.3.1.7.2 Turkey Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
11.3.1.7.3 Turkey Web Content Filtering Market By End-user
11.3.1.8 Rest of Eastern Europe
11.3.1.8.1 Rest of Eastern Europe Web Content Filtering Market By Techniques
11.3.1.8.2 Rest of Eastern Europe Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
11.3.1.8.3 Rest of Eastern Europe Web Content Filtering Market By End-user
11.3.2 Western Europe
11.3.2.1 Western Europe Web Content Filtering Market By Techniques
11.3.2.2 Western Europe Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
11.3.2.3 Western Europe Web Content Filtering Market By End-user
11.3.2.4 Germany
11.3.2.4.1 Germany Web Content Filtering Market By Techniques
11.3.2.4.2 Germany Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
11.3.2.4.3 Germany Web Content Filtering Market By End-user
11.3.2.5 France
11.3.2.5.1 France Web Content Filtering Market By Techniques
11.3.2.5.2 France Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
11.3.2.5.3 France Web Content Filtering Market By End-user
11.3.2.6 UK
11.3.2.6.1 UK Web Content Filtering Market By Techniques
11.3.2.6.2 UK Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
11.3.2.6.3 UK Web Content Filtering Market By End-user
11.3.2.7 Italy
11.3.2.7.1 Italy Web Content Filtering Market By Techniques
11.3.2.7.2 Italy Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
11.3.2.7.3 Italy Web Content Filtering Market By End-user
11.3.2.8 Spain
11.3.2.8.1 Spain Web Content Filtering Market By Techniques
11.3.2.8.2 Spain Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
11.3.2.8.3 Spain Web Content Filtering Market By End-user
11.3.2.9 Netherlands
11.3.2.9.1 Netherlands Web Content Filtering Market By Techniques
11.3.2.9.2 Netherlands Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
11.3.2.9.3 Netherlands Web Content Filtering Market By End-user
11.3.2.10 Switzerland
11.3.2.10.1 Switzerland Web Content Filtering Market By Techniques
11.3.2.10.2 Switzerland Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
11.3.2.10.3 Switzerland Web Content Filtering Market By End-user
11.3.2.11.1 Austria
11.3.2.11.2 Austria Web Content Filtering Market By Techniques
11.3.2.11.3 Austria Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
11.3.2.11.4 Austria Web Content Filtering Market By End-user
11.3.2.12 Rest of Western Europe
11.3.2.12.1 Rest of Western Europe Web Content Filtering Market By Techniques
11.3.2.12.2 Rest of Western Europe Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
11.3.2.12.3 Rest of Western Europe Web Content Filtering Market By End-user
11.4 Asia-Pacific
11.4.1 Asia-Pacific Web Content Filtering Market by Country
11.4.2 Asia-Pacific Web Content Filtering Market By Techniques
11.4.3 Asia-Pacific Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
11.4.4 Asia-Pacific Web Content Filtering Market By End-user
11.4.5 China
11.4.5.1 China Web Content Filtering Market By Techniques
11.4.5.2 China Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
11.4.5.3 China Web Content Filtering Market By End-user
11.4.6 India
11.4.6.1 India Web Content Filtering Market By Techniques
11.4.6.2 India Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
11.4.6.3 India Web Content Filtering Market By End-user
11.4.7 Japan
11.4.7.1 Japan Web Content Filtering Market By Techniques
11.4.7.2 Japan Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
11.4.7.3 Japan Web Content Filtering Market By End-user
11.4.8 South Korea
11.4.8.1 South Korea Web Content Filtering Market By Techniques
11.4.8.2 South Korea Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
11.4.8.3 South Korea Web Content Filtering Market By End-user
11.4.9 Vietnam
11.4.9.1 Vietnam Web Content Filtering Market By Techniques
11.4.9.2 Vietnam Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
11.4.9.3 Vietnam Web Content Filtering Market By End-user
11.4.10 Singapore
11.4.10.1 Singapore Web Content Filtering Market By Techniques
11.4.10.2 Singapore Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
11.4.10.3 Singapore Web Content Filtering Market By End-user
11.4.11 Australia
11.4.11.1 Australia Web Content Filtering Market By Techniques
11.4.11.2 Australia Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
11.4.11.3 Australia Web Content Filtering Market By End-user
11.4.12 Rest of Asia-Pacific
11.4.12.1 Rest of Asia-Pacific Web Content Filtering Market By Techniques
11.4.12.2 Rest of Asia-Pacific Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
11.4.12.3 Rest of Asia-Pacific Web Content Filtering Market By End-user
11.5 Middle East & Africa
11.5.1 Middle East
11.5.1.1 Middle East Web Content Filtering Market by country
11.5.1.2 Middle East Web Content Filtering Market By Techniques
11.5.1.3 Middle East Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
11.5.1.4 Middle East Web Content Filtering Market By End-user
11.5.1.5 UAE
11.5.1.5.1 UAE Web Content Filtering Market By Techniques
11.5.1.5.2 UAE Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
11.5.1.5.3 UAE Web Content Filtering Market By End-user
11.5.1.6 Egypt
11.5.1.6.1 Egypt Web Content Filtering Market By Techniques
11.5.1.6.2 Egypt Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
11.5.1.6.3 Egypt Web Content Filtering Market By End-user
11.5.1.7 Saudi Arabia
11.5.1.7.1 Saudi Arabia Web Content Filtering Market By Techniques
11.5.1.7.2 Saudi Arabia Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
11.5.1.7.3 Saudi Arabia Web Content Filtering Market By End-user
11.5.1.8 Qatar
11.5.1.8.1 Qatar Web Content Filtering Market By Techniques
11.5.1.8.2 Qatar Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
11.5.1.8.3 Qatar Web Content Filtering Market By End-user
11.5.1.9 Rest of Middle East
11.5.1.9.1 Rest of Middle East Web Content Filtering Market By Techniques
11.5.1.9.2 Rest of Middle East Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
11.5.1.9.3 Rest of Middle East Web Content Filtering Market By End-user
11.5.2 Africa
11.5.2.1 Africa Transfusion Diagnostics Market by country
11.5.2.2 Africa Web Content Filtering Market By Techniques
11.5.2.3 Africa Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
11.5.2.4 Africa Web Content Filtering Market By End-user
11.5.2.5 Nigeria
11.5.2.5.1 Nigeria Web Content Filtering Market By Techniques
11.5.2.5.2 Nigeria Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
11.5.2.5.3 Nigeria Web Content Filtering Market By End-user
11.5.2.6 South Africa
11.5.2.6.1 South Africa Web Content Filtering Market By Techniques
11.5.2.6.2 South Africa Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
11.5.2.6.3 South Africa Web Content Filtering Market By End-user
11.5.2.7 Rest of Africa
11.5.2.7.1 Rest of Africa Web Content Filtering Market By Techniques
11.5.2.7.2 Rest of Africa Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
11.5.2.7.3 Rest of Africa Web Content Filtering Market By End-user
11.6 Latin America
11.6.1 Latin America Web Content Filtering Market by country
11.6.2 Latin America Web Content Filtering Market By Techniques
11.6.3 Latin America Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
11.6.4 Latin America Web Content Filtering Market By End-user
11.6.5 Brazil
11.6.5.1 Brazil America Web Content Filtering Market By Techniques
11.6.5.2 Brazil America Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
11.6.5.3 Brazil America Web Content Filtering Market By End-user
11.6.6 Argentina
11.6.6.1 Argentina America Web Content Filtering Market By Techniques
11.6.6.2 Argentina America Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
11.6.6.3 Argentina America Web Content Filtering Market By End-user
11.6.7 Colombia
11.6.7.1 Colombia America Web Content Filtering Market By Techniques
11.6.7.2 Colombia America Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
11.6.7.3 Colombia America Web Content Filtering Market By End-user
11.6.8 Rest of Latin America
11.6.8.1 Rest of Latin America Web Content Filtering Market By Techniques
11.6.8.2 Rest of Latin America Web Content Filtering Market By Organization Size
11.6.8.3 Rest of Latin America Web Content Filtering Market By End-user

12. Company profile
12.1 McAfee Inc.
12.1.1 Company Overview
12.1.2 Financials
12.1.3 Product/Services/Offerings
12.1.4 SWOT Analysis
12.1.5 The SNS View
12.2 Blue Coat Systems Inc.
12.2.1 Company Overview
12.2.2 Financials
12.2.3 Product/Services/Offerings
12.2.4 SWOT Analysis
12.2.5 The SNS View
12.3 Palo Alto Networks Inc.
12.3.1 Company Overview
12.3.2 Financials
12.3.3 Product/Services/Offerings
12.3.4 SWOT Analysis
12.3.5 The SNS View
12.4 Cisco Systems Inc.
12.4.1 Company Overview
12.4.2 Financials
12.4.3 Product/Services/Offerings
12.4.4 SWOT Analysis
12.4.5 The SNS View
12.5 Barracuda Networks Inc.
12.5.1 Company Overview
12.5.2 Financials
12.5.3 Product/Services/Offerings
12.5.4 SWOT Analysis
12.5.5 The SNS View
12.6 ContentKeeper Technologies
12.6.1 Company Overview
12.6.2 Financials
12.6.3 Product/Services/Offerings
12.6.4 SWOT Analysis
12.6.5 The SNS View
12.7 Bloxx, Ltd.
12.7.1 Company Overview
12.7.2 Financials
12.7.3 Product/Services/Offerings
12.7.4 SWOT Analysis
12.7.5 The SNS View
12.8 Trend Micro
12.8.1 Company overview
12.8.2 Financials
12.8.3 Product/Services/Offerings
12.8.4 SWOT Analysis
12.8.5 The SNS View
12.9 Untangle.
12.9.1 Company Overview
12.9.2 Financials
12.9.3 Product/Services/Offerings
12.9.4 SWOT Analysis
12.9.5 The SNS View
12.10 Clearswift.
12.10.1 Company Overview
12.10.2 Financials
12.10.3 Product/Services/Offerings
12.10.4 SWOT Analysis
12.10.5 The SNS View

13. Competitive Landscape
13.1 Competitive Benchmarking
13.2 Market Share Analysis
13.3 Recent Developments
13.3.1 Industry News
13.3.2 Company News
13.3.3 Mergers & Acquisitions

14. Use Case and Best Practices

15. Conclusion

An accurate research report requires proper strategizing as well as implementation. There are multiple factors involved in the completion of good and accurate research report and selecting the best methodology to compete the research is the toughest part. Since the research reports we provide play a crucial role in any company’s decision-making process, therefore we at SNS Insider always believe that we should choose the best method which gives us results closer to reality. This allows us to reach at a stage wherein we can provide our clients best and accurate investment to output ratio.

Each report that we prepare takes a timeframe of 350-400 business hours for production. Starting from the selection of titles through a couple of in-depth brain storming session to the final QC process before uploading our titles on our website we dedicate around 350 working hours. The titles are selected based on their current market cap and the foreseen CAGR and growth.

 

The 5 steps process:

Step 1: Secondary Research:

Secondary Research or Desk Research is as the name suggests is a research process wherein, we collect data through the readily available information. In this process we use various paid and unpaid databases which our team has access to and gather data through the same. This includes examining of listed companies’ annual reports, Journals, SEC filling etc. Apart from this our team has access to various associations across the globe across different industries. Lastly, we have exchange relationships with various university as well as individual libraries.

Secondary Research

Step 2: Primary Research

When we talk about primary research, it is a type of study in which the researchers collect relevant data samples directly, rather than relying on previously collected data.  This type of research is focused on gaining content specific facts that can be sued to solve specific problems. Since the collected data is fresh and first hand therefore it makes the study more accurate and genuine.

We at SNS Insider have divided Primary Research into 2 parts.

Part 1 wherein we interview the KOLs of major players as well as the upcoming ones across various geographic regions. This allows us to have their view over the market scenario and acts as an important tool to come closer to the accurate market numbers. As many as 45 paid and unpaid primary interviews are taken from both the demand and supply side of the industry to make sure we land at an accurate judgement and analysis of the market.

This step involves the triangulation of data wherein our team analyses the interview transcripts, online survey responses and observation of on filed participants. The below mentioned chart should give a better understanding of the part 1 of the primary interview.

Primary Research

Part 2: In this part of primary research the data collected via secondary research and the part 1 of the primary research is validated with the interviews from individual consultants and subject matter experts.

Consultants are those set of people who have at least 12 years of experience and expertise within the industry whereas Subject Matter Experts are those with at least 15 years of experience behind their back within the same space. The data with the help of two main processes i.e., FGDs (Focused Group Discussions) and IDs (Individual Discussions). This gives us a 3rd party nonbiased primary view of the market scenario making it a more dependable one while collation of the data pointers.

Step 3: Data Bank Validation

Once all the information is collected via primary and secondary sources, we run that information for data validation. At our intelligence centre our research heads track a lot of information related to the market which includes the quarterly reports, the daily stock prices, and other relevant information. Our data bank server gets updated every fortnight and that is how the information which we collected using our primary and secondary information is revalidated in real time.

Data Bank Validation

Step 4: QA/QC Process

After all the data collection and validation our team does a final level of quality check and quality assurance to get rid of any unwanted or undesired mistakes. This might include but not limited to getting rid of the any typos, duplication of numbers or missing of any important information. The people involved in this process include technical content writers, research heads and graphics people. Once this process is completed the title gets uploader on our platform for our clients to read it.

Step 5: Final QC/QA Process:

This is the last process and comes when the client has ordered the study. In this process a final QA/QC is done before the study is emailed to the client. Since we believe in giving our clients a good experience of our research studies, therefore, to make sure that we do not lack at our end in any way humanly possible we do a final round of quality check and then dispatch the study to the client.

Start a Conversation

Hi! Click one of our member below to chat on Phone