image

Network Centric Warfare Market Report Scope & Overview:

The Network Centric Warfare Market Size was valued at USD 60.41 billion in 2022 and is expected to reach USD 87.23 billion by 2030 and grow at a CAGR of 4.7% over the forecast period 2023-2030.

Network-centric warfare focuses on strategic frequency domination and is easily integrated into modern warfare. It also includes fifth-generation warfare, which takes place in cyberspace and is used to prevent cyber-attacks and data breaches, as well as national defense. Aeronautical, defense, and security groups utilize advanced technologies in many areas across the world to detect real and potential threats. The use of electromagnetic energy in monitoring, influencing, diminishing, or blocking hostile use of the electromagnetic radiation, as well as the detection of an approaching missile's radar and the collecting of radio communications from an opponent, is known as network-centric warfare.

Network Centric Warfare Market Revenue Analysis

To get more information on Network Centric Warfare Market - Request Free Sample Report

MARKET DYNAMICS

KEY DRIVERS

  • Growing market

  • Terrorism

RESTRAINTS

  • High cost

OPPORTUNITIES

  • Global growth

CHALLENGES

  • Cyberattack

  • Data breaches

IMPACT OF COVID-19

Even as the COVID-19 crisis causes challenges across sectors and a drop in high technology investment, tech companies are increasing their focus on high-demand products and seeking new ways to service their customers.

Real-time information is also essential to protect national boundaries. Even in pandemic scenarios, the emergence of network-centric warfare helps compensate for the demand for intelligence, surveillance, and recognition (ISR) capabilities.

Artificial intelligence (AI), virtual reality (VR), and augmented reality (AR) solutions are expected to play a crucial role in adjusting to the COVID-19 pandemic and tackling ever-changing issues. Such technologies might also be remotely operated and used to monitor future threats in order to respond automatically.

KEY MARKET SEGMENTATION

By Platform

  • Land-based

  • Unmanned

  • Naval-based

  • Air-based

By Application

By Architecture

  • Hardware

  • Software

By Communication Network

  • Wireless

  • Wired

By Mission Type

  • Tactical

  • Strategic

Network Centric Warfare Market Segmentation Analysis

Need any customization research on Network Centric Warfare Market - Enquiry Now

REGIONAL ANALYSIS

In 2022, the Network Centric Warfare Market is predicted to be led by North America, followed by Europe. During the forecast period, Asia-Pacific is expected to develop at the fastest CAGR. Rising demand for technologically superior defense equipment in the digital age, as well as an increase in networked UAVs used by emerging countries for border monitoring, are driving the expansion of this market. Recent improvements in emerging countries' defense budgets for technologically superior marine, land, and air defense equipment, on the other hand, are likely to boost the market in the area.

REGIONAL COVERAGE

North America

  • USA

  • Canada

  • Mexico

Europe

  • Germany

  • UK

  • France

  • Italy

  • Spain

  • The Netherlands

  • Rest of Europe

Asia-Pacific

  • Japan

  • South Korea

  • China

  • India

  • Australia

  • Rest of Asia-Pacific

The Middle East & Africa

  • Israel

  • UAE

  • South Africa

  • Rest of Middle East & Africa

Latin America

  • Brazil

  • Argentina

  • Rest of Latin America

Key Players

The Key Players are Lockheed Martin Corporation, Elbit Systems, Cisco Systems, Rockwell Collins, Thales Group, Northrop Grumann Corporation, General Dynamics Corporation, Raytheon Company, Airbus Group N.V., L-3 Communications Holdings, Bae Systems PLC, Harris Corporation & Other Players.

Elbit Systems-Company Financial Analysis

Network Centric Warfare Market Report Scope:

Report Attributes Details
Market Size in 2022  US$ 60.41 Billion
Market Size by 2030  US$ 87.23 Billion
CAGR  CAGR of 4.7% From 2023 to 2030
Base Year  2022
Forecast Period  2023-2030
Historical Data  2020-2021
Report Scope & Coverage Market Size, Segments Analysis, Competitive  Landscape, Regional Analysis, DROC & SWOT Analysis, Forecast Outlook
Key Segments • By Platform (Land-based, Unmanned, Naval-based, Air-based)
• By Application (ISR (intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance), Communications, Command and Control, Computers, Combat, Cyber, Electronic Warfare)
• By Architecture (Hardware, Software)
• By Communication Network (Wireless, Wired)
• By Mission Type (Tactical, Strategic)
Regional Analysis/Coverage North America (USA, Canada, Mexico), Europe
(Germany, UK, France, Italy, Spain, Netherlands,
Rest of Europe), Asia-Pacific (Japan, South Korea,
China, India, Australia, Rest of Asia-Pacific), The
Middle East & Africa (Israel, UAE, South Africa,
Rest of Middle East & Africa), Latin America (Brazil, Argentina, Rest of Latin America)
Company Profiles Lockheed Martin Corporation, Elbit Systems, Cisco Systems, Rockwell Collins, Thales Group, Northrop Grumann Corporation, General Dynamics Corporation, Raytheon Company, Airbus Group N.V., L-3 Communications Holdings, Bae Systems PLC, Harris Corporation.
DRIVERS • Growing market
• Terrorism
RESTRAINTS • High cost

Frequently Asked Questions

The market size of the Network Centric Warfare Market was valued at USD 60.41 billion in 2022.

Ans: The Network Centric Warfare Market is growing at a CAGR of 4.7% from 2023 to 2030.

The key players of the Network Centric Warfare Market are Lockheed Martin Corporation, Elbit Systems, Cisco Systems, Rockwell Collins, Thales Group, Northrop Grumann Corporation, General Dynamics Corporation, Raytheon Company, Airbus Group N.V., L-3 Communications Holdings, Bae Systems PLC, and Harris Corporation.

The Network Centric Warfare Market is segmented into 5 types: By Communication Network, By Mission Type, By Architecture, By Platform, and By Application.

North America region dominated the Network Centric Warfare Market.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

1.1 Market Definition 

1.2 Market Scope

1.3 Research Assumptions

2. Research Methodology

3. Market Dynamics

3.1 Drivers

3.2 Restraints

3.3 Opportunities

3.4 Challenges

4. Impact Analysis

4.1 COVID-19 Impact Analysis

4.2 Impact of Ukraine- Russia war

4.3 Impact of ongoing Recession

4.3.1 Introduction

4.3.2 Impact on major economies

4.3.2.1 US

4.3.2.2 Canada

4.3.2.3 Germany

4.3.2.4 France

4.3.2.5 United Kingdom

4.3.2.6 China

4.3.2.7 Japan

4.3.2.8 South Korea

4.3.2.9 Rest of the World

5. Value Chain Analysis

6. Porter’s 5 forces model

7.  PEST Analysis

8. Network Centric Warfare Market, By Platform

8.1 Land-based

8.2 Unmanned

8.3 Naval-based

8.4 Air-based

9. Network Centric Warfare Market, By Application

9.1 ISR 

9.2 Communications

9.3 Command and Control

9.4 Computers

9.5 Combat

9.6 Cyber

9.7 Electronic Warfare

10. Network Centric Warfare Market, By Architecture

10.1 Hardware

10.1 Software

11. Network Centric Warfare Market, By Communication Network

11.1 Wireless

11.2 Wired

12. Network Centric Warfare Market, By Mission Type

12.1 Tactical

12.2 Strategic

13. Regional Analysis

13.1 Introduction

13.2 North America

13.2.1 USA

13.2.2    Canada

13.2.3    Mexico

13.3    Europe

13.3.1    Germany

13.3.2    UK

13.3.3    France

13.3.4    Italy

13.3.5    Spain

13.3.6    The Netherlands

13.3.7    Rest of Europe

13.4    Asia-Pacific

13.4.1    Japan

13.4.2    South Korea

13.4.3    China

13.4.4    India

13.4.5    Australia

13.4.6    Rest of Asia-Pacific

13.5    The Middle East & Africa

13.5.1    Israel

13.5.2    UAE

13.5.3    South Africa

13.5.4    Rest

13.6    Latin America

13.6.1    Brazil

13.6.2    Argentina

13.6.3    Rest of Latin America

14. Company Profiles

14.1 HITACHI LTD.

14.1.1 Financial

14.1.2 Products/ Services Offered

14.1.3 SWOT Analysis

14.1.4 The SNS view

14.2 AB VOLVO

14.3 CATTERPILLAR INC.

14.4 CNH INDUSTRIAL N.V

14.5 DEERE AND COMPANY

14.6 DOOSAN INFRACOE CO.LTD

14.7 J C BAMFORD EXCAVATORS. LTD.

14.8 KOMATSU LTD.

14.9 Liebherr-international AG

14.10 XCMG GROUP

15. Competitive Landscape

15.1 Competitive Benchmark

15.2 Market Share Analysis

15.3 Recent Developments

16. Conclusion

An accurate research report requires proper strategizing as well as implementation. There are multiple factors involved in the completion of good and accurate research report and selecting the best methodology to compete the research is the toughest part. Since the research reports we provide play a crucial role in any company’s decision-making process, therefore we at SNS Insider always believe that we should choose the best method which gives us results closer to reality. This allows us to reach at a stage wherein we can provide our clients best and accurate investment to output ratio.

Each report that we prepare takes a timeframe of 350-400 business hours for production. Starting from the selection of titles through a couple of in-depth brain storming session to the final QC process before uploading our titles on our website we dedicate around 350 working hours. The titles are selected based on their current market cap and the foreseen CAGR and growth.

 

The 5 steps process:

Step 1: Secondary Research:

Secondary Research or Desk Research is as the name suggests is a research process wherein, we collect data through the readily available information. In this process we use various paid and unpaid databases which our team has access to and gather data through the same. This includes examining of listed companies’ annual reports, Journals, SEC filling etc. Apart from this our team has access to various associations across the globe across different industries. Lastly, we have exchange relationships with various university as well as individual libraries.

Secondary Research

Step 2: Primary Research

When we talk about primary research, it is a type of study in which the researchers collect relevant data samples directly, rather than relying on previously collected data.  This type of research is focused on gaining content specific facts that can be sued to solve specific problems. Since the collected data is fresh and first hand therefore it makes the study more accurate and genuine.

We at SNS Insider have divided Primary Research into 2 parts.

Part 1 wherein we interview the KOLs of major players as well as the upcoming ones across various geographic regions. This allows us to have their view over the market scenario and acts as an important tool to come closer to the accurate market numbers. As many as 45 paid and unpaid primary interviews are taken from both the demand and supply side of the industry to make sure we land at an accurate judgement and analysis of the market.

This step involves the triangulation of data wherein our team analyses the interview transcripts, online survey responses and observation of on filed participants. The below mentioned chart should give a better understanding of the part 1 of the primary interview.

Primary Research

Part 2: In this part of primary research the data collected via secondary research and the part 1 of the primary research is validated with the interviews from individual consultants and subject matter experts.

Consultants are those set of people who have at least 12 years of experience and expertise within the industry whereas Subject Matter Experts are those with at least 15 years of experience behind their back within the same space. The data with the help of two main processes i.e., FGDs (Focused Group Discussions) and IDs (Individual Discussions). This gives us a 3rd party nonbiased primary view of the market scenario making it a more dependable one while collation of the data pointers.

Step 3: Data Bank Validation

Once all the information is collected via primary and secondary sources, we run that information for data validation. At our intelligence centre our research heads track a lot of information related to the market which includes the quarterly reports, the daily stock prices, and other relevant information. Our data bank server gets updated every fortnight and that is how the information which we collected using our primary and secondary information is revalidated in real time.

Data Bank Validation

Step 4: QA/QC Process

After all the data collection and validation our team does a final level of quality check and quality assurance to get rid of any unwanted or undesired mistakes. This might include but not limited to getting rid of the any typos, duplication of numbers or missing of any important information. The people involved in this process include technical content writers, research heads and graphics people. Once this process is completed the title gets uploader on our platform for our clients to read it.

Step 5: Final QC/QA Process:

This is the last process and comes when the client has ordered the study. In this process a final QA/QC is done before the study is emailed to the client. Since we believe in giving our clients a good experience of our research studies, therefore, to make sure that we do not lack at our end in any way humanly possible we do a final round of quality check and then dispatch the study to the client.

Start a Conversation

Hi! Click one of our member below to chat on Phone